Is your outside counsel costing you time, money and case results?

TERIS Silicon Valley Managing Partner Kevin BrooksBy Kevin Brooks, Managing Partner, TERIS, Northern California

You may believe that litigation support management is better left to your outside counsel. And in some situations, this may be true. However, in many cases your law firm could be costing you time and money, as well as affecting case outcome. Law firms are experts in the law, but very few have the resources and data expertise to manage your litigation lifecycle properly.

This is why a growing number of corporations are bypassing their outside counsel and contacting TERIS directly to handle sensitive services such as eDiscovery, document review and digital forensics. As new case law brings the importance of eDiscovery into the spotlight, more and more companies are discovering that it is crucial to ensure compliance and avoid sanctions by working directly with a knowledgeable data expert.

When a litigation support provider works directly with the corporation, the provider can serve as an effective conduit for both the corporation and the law firm. The provider may even work with a number of different outside counsels, serving as the primary contact for the corporation.

Additionally, many law firms, as well as some vendors, still use one single platform to handle data. A knowledgeable and technologically adept litigation support provider realizes that the one-size-fits-all approach is inadequate and, instead, offers multiple solutions to fit different case and data needs.

Ten important reasons why you should hire a litigation support vendor directly:

1.       Cost and Expense ForecastConsult directly with data experts to more accurately identify costs for each project and keep expenses down. Vendors can also help cut future costs by proactively consulting on your data.

2.       Timeliness – Manage requests and deadlines quickly and more accurately through direct contact with your service provider, eliminating delays that can sometimes occur when going through outside counsel.

3.       Budget Management – Identify points of savings by being able to initiate volume discounts. The service provider can extend volume discounts as they build long-term relationships directly with corporations. You can also avoid the markup from some law firms which could increase your costs for services from 25 percent to as much as 100 percent.

4.       Streamlined Litigation Management - Reduce the number of vendors your corporation works with. This is especially relevant if your company works with several outside counsels and all have their own separate lit support vendors.

5.       Consultation – Give your litigation support provider a consulting role and front row view into the game plan instead of a 100 percent reactive position. By working with a provider who understands data, you can avoid sanctions for under or overproducing, which could reach tens of millions of dollars.

6.       Preparation – Address issues at the earliest point in litigation and improve efficiency by involving the litigation support provider in planning from the start.

7.      Expertise – Allow your outside counsel to concentrate on their core competency of legal strategy, while you work directly with data experts.

8.      Resources – Access the most cutting-edge technology for handling data. Small and medium-sized law firms may not have an in-house IT department to manage large numbers of electronic documents.

9.       Efficiency – Work hand in hand with the service provider, eliminating the middleman.

10.   Security – Gain better control over sensitive data and information.

Tips for selecting the right provider for your company:

  • Look for a true end-to-end provider with a litigation preparedness plan that can take your cases from collections to processing, hosting and trial services.
  • Qualify the provider through experience; your law firm may spearhead that process.
  • Request references from companies that are similar to yours in size and industry.
  • Identify the service provider’s true capabilities vs. partnerships. Do they actually own, operate and control the processes themselves or do they collaborate with other providers?
  • Ask if they are software agnostic. Many providers are locked into one or two technologies, so verify that the service bureau has more than one solution and can meet all your needs.
  • Ensure their solutions are thoroughly tested and proven.
  • Verify that the provider has a true physical location and not a virtual office. Request a tour of the facility, as well as a copy of the workflow and security protocols.

It’s clear why your corporation and legal department should have direct interaction with litigation support providers to consolidate efforts and streamline costs. Experts such as TERIS bring a highly-specialized legal and data skill-set for case management, as well as the foresight and consulting experience for client management, so you can be confident your project is always handled with the highest level of professional care.

Kevin Brooks is a managing partner at TERIS, the largest full-service litigation support provider on the West Coast, offering sophisticated consultation-based solutions, state-of-the-art technologies and highly experienced project management. In the past five years, Brooks has achieved 250 percent revenue growth while managing 150 employees in multiple offices in Northern California. For more information, please visit www.TERIS.com.

Plaintiffs Sanctioned for Failure to Produce Electronic Files in Hedge Fund Suit

From Law.com

Mark Hamblett
New York Law Journal
January 19, 2010

A federal judge has sanctioned 13 plaintiffs suing two collapsed hedge funds for negligence and gross negligence for their failure to preserve electronic files in discovery.

Saying "most plaintiffs conducted discovery in an ignorant and indifferent fashion," Southern District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin will assess monetary sanctions against all 13 plaintiffs and give an adverse jury instruction for six of the worst offenders in The Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities LLC, 05 Civ. 9016.

"While litigants are not required to execute document productions with absolute precision, at a minimum they must act diligently and search thoroughly at the time they reasonably anticipate litigation," Schiendlin said in her 87-page opinion. "All of the plaintiffs in this motion failed to do so and have been sanctioned accordingly."

The lawsuit was brought by investors who sought to recover losses of $550 million following the liquidation of two hedge funds based in the British Virgin Islands. Banc of America and other defendants have already settled the case, which involves a total of 96 plaintiffs.

The chief defendant remaining is Citgo Fund Services, which was hired by the two hedge funds to perform certain administrative services.

It was Citgo that brought the sanctions motion, and it is Citgo that will be compensated, with a yet-to-be-determined amount, in the form of costs and attorney's fees, including fees and expenses associated with filing sanctions motions, reviewing declarations and deposing declarants.

Citgo, its parent company and two directors will also benefit in the adverse jury instruction with respect to six plaintiffs. Scheindlin said she will tell the jury that relevant evidence was destroyed after the duty to preserve arose and that the plaintiffs were grossly negligent. It would then be up to the jury to decide whether the evidence was relevant.

The six plaintiffs who will get the adverse instruction, including the Morton Meyerson Family Foundation and the Defined Benefit Plan for Hunnicutt & Co., she said, conducted "severely deficient" searches in response to document requests in 2003 and 2004.

The judge criticized the six plaintiffs for:

• failure "to institute a timely written litigation hold" -- a communication to employees to stop the routine and legitimate destruction of data in anticipation of commercial litigation or a civil enforcement action;

• failure "to collect or preserve anyelectronic documents prior to 2007;

• continued deletion of electronic documents after the duty to preserve arose;

• failure to request documents from key players;

• delegation of search efforts without supervision from management: and

• destruction of backup data potentially containing responsive documents of key players and/or submitted misleading or inaccurate declarations.

Scheindlin has written extensively on electronic discovery, especially in Zubulake v. UBS Warburg, 02 Civ. 1243, where she placed particular emphasis on the litigation hold in issuing a string of opinions on such matters as sanctions for destroying e-mails, sharing the costs of e-discovery and new standards for cost-shifting.

Scheindlin subtitled her opinion "Zubulake Revisited: Six Years Later."

In her opinion, Scheindlin lamented the time wasted in considering sanctions motions in complex cases involving electronic discovery, estimating that she and her two law clerks "spent close to 300 hours resolving this motion."

Scott M. Berman of Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman is the lead lawyer for the pension funds, charitable foundations and other aggrieved investors who are pressing the case against Citgo.

"We respect the court's decision but believe that clients and counsel did what was required by existing law, custom and practice," Berman said. "In prior decisions the court has denied Citgo's motions to dismiss and for summary judgment. Other defendants have settled with plaintiffs and we look forward to trying the merit of the case against Citgo."

Lewis N. Brown of Gilbride, Heller & Brown is the lead lawyer for Citgo.

Eliot Lauer of Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle is Citgo's New York counsel.

"The court's opinion reinforces what it stated in the Zubulake case, that it is no longer an excuse to say 'Well, until I get a subpoena or a document request, I was destroying stuff in the ordinary course of business,'" Lauer said. "Counsel and the parties have an absolute obligation to take affirmative steps to ensure the litigation hold and the preservation of data is, in fact, maintained. You can't just pay lip service. It's cynical and insincere to hide behind ordinary document destruction programs."



Subscribe to New York Law Journal

Microsoft Corporation Deploys Clearwell to Assist With E-Discovery

Big news in the eDiscovery world (and Puget Sound area) with word that Microsoft selected Clearwell - which happens to be one of our featured solutions.

TERIS can work with corporations to either purchase the appliance and service (if they want to bring it in-house) or offer the service on an as-needed project bases.

The reality is there are not many corporations that can justify the cost of bringing the tool in-house anyway, because only a small percentage of companies deal with the same volume of litigation as Microsoft.

Regardless whether companies elect to purchase it or use it on a project basis, Clearwell is becoming even more pervasive and popular in the corporate world.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA--(Marketwire - January 12, 2010) - Clearwell Systems, Inc., a leader in intelligent e-discovery, today announced Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT), a Fortune 500 company, has deployed the Clearwell E-Discovery Platform as a component of its in-house e-discovery strategy. Microsoft's legal and IT teams use Clearwell to increase the efficiency of the e-discovery process for litigation, regulatory inquiries and internal investigations.

"E-discovery costs are a significant portion of litigation costs," said Rich Wallis, deputy general counsel of litigation at Microsoft. "With the implementation of Clearwell's pre-processing, processing and analysis solution, we are further streamlining our e-discovery processes, starting with early case assessment, intelligent and appropriate minimization and search."

The Clearwell E-Discovery Platform is fully operational in less than 25 minutes and provides users with immediate visibility into case facts, significantly accelerating early case assessment. Clearwell's Transparent Search, metadata filters, and people analytics enable users to quickly and defensibly eliminate irrelevant documents and false positives, lowering processing costs and reducing review workload. The product's discussion threading and relevance ranking capabilities display documents in context, further increasing review throughput. Responsive documents can be produced or seamlessly uploaded into litigation support databases via EDRM-compliant XML and other major load file formats. In addition, the Clearwell E-Discovery Platform automatically tracks all actions on case documents throughout the e-discovery workflow, ensuring a defensible e-discovery process.

"The e-discovery expense will continue to increase as the amount of electronically stored information grows," said Kamal Shah, vice president of product management and marketing at Clearwell Systems. "To cope with this, many companies like Microsoft are choosing Clearwell to perform early case assessments in-house and gain control over e-discovery costs."

About Clearwell Systems

Clearwell Systems is transforming the way enterprises and law firms perform electronic discovery (e-discovery) in response to litigation, regulatory inquiries, and internal investigations. The Clearwell E-Discovery Platform automates the processing, analysis, review, and production phases of e-discovery via a single, integrated product. Leading organizations such as Constellation Energy, Cisco, DLA Piper, Johnson & Johnson, Toyota, and the Department of Homeland Security / Office of Inspector General are using Clearwell to accelerate early case assessments, intelligently cull-down data, increase reviewer productivity, and ensure the defensibility of their e-discovery process. Consistently ranked as a leader in independent industry surveys and reports, Clearwell Systems is an active participant in the Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM) Project and The Sedona Conference. For more information, visit www.clearwellsystems.com, follow us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/clearwell, or subscribe to the E-Discovery 2.0 blog at http://www.clearwellsystems.com/e-discovery-blog/.

About Microsoft

Founded in 1975, Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) is the worldwide leader in software, services and solutions that help people and businesses realize their full potential.

Three Minute Video on 'Victor Stanley v. Creative Pipe' and Search

Thanks to the e-Discovery Team Blog for this.

This video is an excerpt from the last day of a law school class on Electronic Discovery taught by Professor Bill Hamilton and myself at the University of Florida. This three minute take summarizes and reminds the students about Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc., 250 FRD 251, 2008 WL 2221841 (D.C. M.D. 2008).
 

 

EDiscovery market set for 2010 boom: Gartner

from CBR

Published:16-December-2009

Litigation fuelling growth

The eDiscovery software market is set for rapid growth, with revenues expected to surpass $1.2bn in 2010, according to analyst house Gartner. The market this year is tipped to total $1bn, a 25% increase over 2008 figures.

Gartner defines eDiscovery as, “the identification, preservation, collection, preparation, review and production of electronically stored information associated with legal and government proceedings.”

It can be delivered on-promise or through a SaaS offering.

The growth in the market is being fuelled by increasing levels of litigation across the business world. Craig Carpenter, VP of marketing at eDiscovery and eDisclosure form Recommind, told CBR that the economic situation was driving more companies to take legal proceedings.

“When times are good, people don’t sue each other very much; they’re making money and they have money. When times are bad, people tend to sue a lot more,” he said. “EDiscovery and eDisclosure are becoming core platforms for businesses. I think we’ll start to see more and more of this soft of software over the next few years.”

Tom Eid, research vice president at Gartner claims that the market will continue to grow throughout 2011, with consolidation continuing beyond then. While existing vendors will expand their product line, the emergence of eDiscovery as a high-growth market will see more companies enter the space, Gartner said.

While the US has been the biggest market for eDiscovery – accounting for about 90% of the market revenue in 2008 – other territories such as the UK, Australia, Canada and South Africa are expected to see large revenue growth over the next few years.

“The December 2006 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures (FRCP) in the U.S. regarding the discovery of electronically stored information (ESI) and passing of subsequent similar statutes in other countries, has really spurred market interest in eDiscovery,” said Eid. “This is prompting many companies to rethink their overall information management strategies, from the policy level to the implementation level.”

Players in the eDiscovery scene include Autonomy, Recommind, EMC and ZyLAB.

TERIS Phoenix adds Electronic Discovery and Litigation Support professionals Brandon Colburn, Dennis Brooks and Todd Sparck

PHOENIX, AZ – December 2, 2009 – TERIS Phoenix announced today the addition of three leading litigation support professionals to its growing Phoenix office. Brandon Colburn joins as Electronic Discovery Account Executive; Dennis Brooks joins as Director of IT/Project Manager and Todd Sparck joins as Production Manager for the company. The trio brings a combined mix of experience from both the legal and litigation support industries that bring immediate value for new and existing TERIS Phoenix clients.

TERIS Phoenix Managing Partner Richard Saldivar“This group of experienced industry professionals brings a wealth of value to our clients within law firms and corporations alike,” said Richard Saldivar, TERIS Phoenix Managing Partner. “Our clients need a greater level of experience and proficiency in eDiscovery and related services. Brandon, Dennis and Todd are valuable additions as we continue to build our considerable expertise and success in these areas because ESI is one of our major areas of focus as we enter 2010 and serve a growing number of clients.”

Colburn joins TERIS from trial presentation firm Legalsized Inc., where he served as the region sales manager. He introduced the company into the Phoenix market and was responsible for sales and strategic partnerships. Colburn was also responsible for coordinating trial team support for Fortune 100 companies and ALM firms both locally and nationwide. Colburn has built a strong relationship for his work helping companies with corporate revenue growth, production organization, industry networking and public speaking.

Brooks comes to TERIS with considerable experience in the ESI industry. He is an industry recognized, litigation technology leader who thrives on managing multiple large, complex discovery projects. Prior to joining TERIS, Brooks was instrumental in growing the ESI business from zero to $5 million at RLS in the first twelve months of the practice. He also worked for Forensic Consulting Services (FCS). Saldivar noted that Brooks also has experience managing multi-Terabyte projects, which will be a huge asset to TERIS Phoenix as the company builds its ESI portfolio.

Sparck brings more than 10 years of litigation support experience to TERIS. He previously worked for IKON where he was the trainer for the Desert Southwest Operations Teams and later went on to serve as Director of Production for Encore.

About TERIS

Founded in 1996, TERIS provides legal support services and sophisticated eDiscovery solutions to corporate legal teams and law firms across the U.S. and internationally. TERIS’ staff of over 300 was named one of the top 20 eDiscovery service providers by industry researcher Socha-Gelbmann in 2008. The company operates a free job board for the legal profession at www.discoverlegaljobs.com and has offices in Seattle, San Francisco, Silicon Valley, San Diego, Phoenix, Austin, Dallas and Chicago. To learn more about TERIS, visit www.TERIS.com or follow the company on Twitter at www.Twitter.com/DiscoverTERIS.

Media Contact: David Kaufer, Vice President of Marketing and Communications, 206-521-8717 or DKaufer (at) TERIS.com

 

TERIS becomes one of the first litigation support service providers to offer Clearwell E-Discovery Platform version 5.0 to its clients

Seattle, WA – December 2, 2009 – TERIS announced today the addition of Clearwell E-Discovery Platform Version 5.0 to the firm’s product offering. The latest version features new pre-processing, review and production modules that help lawyers pre-process, analyze, search, review, redact, and produce documents within a single product, eliminating the need to use multiple tools and enabling an iterative and defensible e-discovery process.

Clearwell Pre-Processing Module provides interactive graphs that enable e-discovery teams to quickly filter out data by known files (both NSRL NIST list as well as custom lists), custodian, date, file type, and size, significantly reducing downstream processing and review costs. Clearwell Review Module enables reviewers to quickly redact documents, apply reason codes, and verify redactions prior to production. Decision-tree tagging using a multi-layer tree structure prevents errors and minimizes the number of clicks needed to accurately tag a document. Clearwell Production Module offers a range of production options, including bates stamping, watermarking, custom header/footer, and various export options. In addition to these three new modules, the Clearwell E-Discovery Platform V5.0 delivers over 20 new features and enhancements in its industry-leading processing and early case analysis module.

TERIS CTO Peter Sternkopf“This latest version of Clearwell is a dramatic step forward in capabilities,” said Peter Sternkopf, TERIS Chief Technology Officer. “The new platform addresses the glaring need for an eDiscovery product that reduces the number of tools required in a case and also helps reduce the repetitive movement of data.”

“We have been a longtime partner with Clearwell and appreciate the opportunity to work with the development team to contribute feedback and ideas for the new 5.0 platform,” Sternkopf continued. “Our eDiscovery team can now perform all of the post-collection phases of eDiscovery in a single, integrated application, instead of using three or four separate tools.”


ABOUT TERIS
Founded in 1996, TERIS provides legal support and sophisticated eDiscovery solutions to corporate legal teams and law firms across the U.S. and internationally. TERIS’ staff of over 300 was named one of the top 20 eDiscovery service providers by industry researcher Socha-Gelbmann in 2008. The company operates a free job board for the legal profession at www.discoverlegaljobs.com and has offices in Seattle, San Francisco, Silicon Valley, San Diego, Phoenix,, Austin, Dallas and Chicago. To learn more about TERIS, visit www.TERIS.com or follow the company on Twitter at www.Twitter.com/DiscoverTERIS.

Media Contact: David Kaufer, Vice President of Marketing and Communications, 425-275-8814 (mobile); 206-521-8717 (office) or DKaufer (at) TERIS.com
 

Managing e-Discovery Costs - Risk Managers Must Learn To Tame Expenses

From Claims Magazine:
By Kevin M. Quinley

In litigation, the discovery process has always been expensive. With computers and digital technology, though, there are added layers of complexity and cost. Discovery no longer involves just reviewing boxes and boxes of papers. Regardless of the dispute — product liability, employment practices, or directors and officers — discovery now entails exhaustive searches of electronic data. This means sifting through computer hard drives, thumb drives, servers, tapes, e-mail strings, archives, instant messenger dialogue, and so on. Searching electronic data sources consumes huge chunks of time and dollars.

Now let’s consider that 36 billion e-mails are transmitted each day. This pace rises 20 percent annually. Ninety-three percent of all information is now stored digitally, with 70 percent of that never actually printed. A 2007 Kroll survey revealed the following:

· Twenty-five percent of U.S. corporate in-house counsel claim to be current with all case-law developments and regulations relating to electronically stored information (ESI).

· Only half of the respondents said that their organizations had a policy regarding ESI.

· Seventy-five percent report losing time and money because of inefficient ESI processes.
 

Read the rest of the article here

Electronic Discovery and Computer Forensic veteran Scott Andraschko joins TERIS Silicon Valley as Director of ESI

Addition of technology and computer forensic veteran solidifies firm’s expertise in ESI collections and Electronic Discovery engagements

Palo Alto, CA – November 23, 2009 – TERIS Silicon Valley announced today that leading Electronic Discovery and Computer Forensic expert Scott Andraschko joined the company as its new Director of Electronically Stored Information (ESI). Andraschko has more than 15 years experience in eDiscovery processing, ESI collection/acquisition and Computer Forensics. He will oversee both the imaging and ESI departments. His primary responsibilities are to streamline processes, document procedures, cross train employees, and provide training/reviews of all employees in those departments. He also will provide client support for sales representatives.

Scott brings to us a strong track record of successfully working with clients to reduce both the duration and cost of eDiscovery processing, analysis, and review,” said Kevin Brooks, TERIS Silicon Valley General Manager and Partner. “He has a thorough knowledge and understanding of eDiscovery, Forensic Services, Investigations and IT issues that will be valuable for our growing list of clients in the Silicon Valley.

Andraschko joins TERIS from McNamara Business Solutions, where he served as Director of Information Technology/eDiscovery. At McNamara he streamlined and automated all phases of EDD, enabling companies to accelerate early case assessments, lower processing costs, reduce review workload, and enhance the defensibility of e-discovery. He previously worked at KPMG as Manager Forensic Technology Services, where he successfully managed a 10 person team that operated at multiple sites performing end to end eDiscovery services. He also has experience managing multiple services including ESI collection/acquisition, early case assessment, culling, deduping, analysis and SaaS hosted review.